This morning as I contemplated what this class means to me in my last semester at Goucher I realized how relevant it is. I have considered my struggles the past four years as frustrations and set backs but what I am really doing is fighting internal Goucher policies that are set to fit the average student, but not satisfactory for any student that may exist on the fringes. Kraft and Mazmanian talk about the same problems when it comes to environmental policy. They are emphasizing the struggle to affect changes when administrations have no vision or ability to budge from the norm. Slowly but surely I am getting what I want because I have never let down my persistence and that is how this class has presented the successful environmental policies. Policy and beauraucracy are the same no matter what the cause.
I wonder if my struggle for equal treatment at Goucher will have any impact on the administrators I see. Will they react in the same cold and calculated way when another non-traditional student asks for help? Have my stress and tears and migraines done anything to break policies and rules that discriminate? I'm sure these type of questions emerge when a non-profit gets a big break with the government regarding a valuable piece of environmental legislation. The little organization faces daunting tasks and huge insecurities as well. Will their lobbying stay relevant? Will the law make the right changes? etc. etc. etc...

4/5
ReplyDeleteKristi,
I like this post and am happy that the benefits of the readings flow out past the pages ;-) AdB